Logic Puzzle Forums How to Solve a Logic Puzzle
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
01-29-2014, 12:44 PM
 admin Administrator Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 153
How to Solve a Logic Puzzle

We've put together a new, in-depth tutorial that covers all the basics of grid-based logic puzzles, as well as many intermediate- and advanced-level solving techniques. Any feedback on the tutorial would be greatly appreciated.

The tutorial can be found here:
http://logic-puzzles.org/how-to-solv...gic-puzzle.php

Thanks!
#2
01-29-2014, 01:41 PM
 Alethea Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 39

These tutorials are a great idea - they explain so much more in depth than it's possible to do with just the hints. Clicked around the various subheadings and through their steps, and everything seems to be functioning perfectly so far.
#3
01-30-2014, 02:36 AM
 stanstar Senior Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Leith, Edinburgh, Scotland at present UK Posts: 127
Admin a mistake in Either or clues description slide # 3

Hi admin I am sorry to point out that the description in Either or clues slide #3 is wrong and misleading. I post what it says here: Slide #3
Just like the "neither/nor" clue, an "either/or" clue implies that the two items (Laura and \$40) being discussed in relation to the third (Pisces) are separate entities. The Pisces can be either Laura's tattoo or the one that cost \$40 - we don't know which of the two it is, but we know it definitely cannot be both.

Therefore we know that Laura's tattoo didn't cost \$40, and we can mark an X on the grid where those two options intersect.

I will highlight the misleading part.

In my opinion it should read as follows: The Pisces can be Laura's tattoo or NOT Laura's tattoo, and the \$40 is Laura's tattoo or NOT Laura's tattoo. Therefore The PISCES tattoo and the \$40 are false. That is all the deduction we can infer.

Stan
#4
01-30-2014, 05:43 AM
 admin Administrator Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 153

Thanks Stan! You're absolutely right - the text for that slide is fixed now.
#5
01-30-2014, 05:54 AM
 stanstar Senior Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Leith, Edinburgh, Scotland at present UK Posts: 127

No problem Admin
IMO the rest of the help makes sense to me. No other misleads. No charge for proof reading.

Stan

PS Now I am going to try to beat my record time of 19mins for a 4x5 challenge type.
#6
01-30-2014, 10:57 AM
 BillsBayou Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: New Orleans Posts: 77

"Comparative Relationships" Slide #4: If Wilma's tattoo is \$10 more than the red one

That should read: If Wilma's tattoo is \$10 LESS than the red one
#7
01-30-2014, 11:02 AM
 BillsBayou Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: New Orleans Posts: 77

"Transitive Relationships (Either/Or)" Slide #1

Since \$40 is already false for Isaac, it must be true for orange. Get rid of that "X" and the tutorial plays out correctly.
#8
01-30-2014, 11:08 AM
 stanstar Senior Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Leith, Edinburgh, Scotland at present UK Posts: 127

Hi Bill you are correct Sir. You have a keener eye than mine. I also spotted while checking that in the same explanation it incorrectly says that gemini is greater than Red instead of lesser than red.
Here it is:

If Wilma's tattoo is \$10 more than the red one, and the Gemini tattoo is \$5 more than the red one, then Wilma's tattoo can't be equal to the Gemini tattoo. They are both different "distances" away from the same item ("red tattoo") in relation to price - therefore they are different entities.

Stan
#9
01-30-2014, 11:25 AM
 BillsBayou Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: New Orleans Posts: 77

"Transitive Relationships (Unaligned Pair)"

I'd like to see more on the power of Unaligned Pairs. While your example does a good example of showing the transitive relationship as a solving method, Slide #7 does a poor job of showing off cross eliminations.

In an Unaligned Pair clue such as the one given, the intersection of "Zachary" and "Aquarius" become the center of a cross elimination that affects "Blue" and "\$40". That box is "Sign-Name". For all Names eliminated by "Aquarius" and all Signs eliminated by "Zachary", neither "Blue" nor "\$40" can be those values.

Thus "Zachary/Aquarius" points to "Bonita" and "Taurus". Eliminate both "Bonita" and "Taurus" from the possible values of "Blue" and the possible values of "\$40".

If you weren't pointing out the transitive technique, you could have used cross eliminations by showing that "Blue/\$40" points to "Orange", "Violet", "\$45", \$50", "\$60", and eliminate those 5 values from each of "Zachary" and "Aquarius".
#10
01-30-2014, 12:03 PM
 admin Administrator Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 153

Quote:
 Originally Posted by BillsBayou "Comparative Relationships" Slide #4: If Wilma's tattoo is \$10 more than the red one That should read: If Wilma's tattoo is \$10 LESS than the red one
Absolutely right - fixed it now, thanks!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Logic-Puzzles.org Discussion     Questions About Logic-Puzzles.org     Comments, Bugs and Feature Requests Other Logic Puzles     Logic Puzzles and Brain Benders Puzzle Baron's Logic Puzzles - The Book!

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01 PM.

 Contact Us - Logic Puzzles - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

### About Puzzle Baron

The Puzzle Baron family of web sites has served millions and millions of puzzle enthusiasts since its inception in 2006. From cryptograms to acrostics, logic puzzles to drop quotes, patchwords to wordtwist and even sudoku, we run the gamut in word puzzles, printable puzzles and logic games.