#1  
Old 02-07-2013, 06:55 PM
pcuser pcuser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 122
Wink Record times...

I thought that unrealistic times for records weren't going to be posted. This has been addressed in at least 1 thread, probably more. I seem to recall a general consensus that times for 5X5 puzzles couldn't be achieved under 100 seconds without aids or memorization. I have seen a puzzle by zenobia43 with a record in the low 60 seconds and one by tulga.more of 65 seconds. Why do we have to compete with puzzle scores that at best were achieved by memorization and at worst by use of aids.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2013, 12:06 AM
pcuser pcuser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 122
Default

I'm surprised there is no comment about this issue. It's usually been a popular a larger concern among the solvers...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2013, 06:40 PM
cerri cerri is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Default

Until now I was just playing and I first hear about consensus like this... Really there was something like this? I mean, ok, in some older types of games I kind of remembered some patterns (never wrote it down, etc., but recognizing it in the middle of game helps a little in faster ending, in minimal it helps to look at clues person needs at that moment), but I can manage without any help or any memorizing do 5x5 under 100, or even under 80 without bigger problems - even when I play them first time (or after long time, which is the same for me), when they are easy enough (and then there are some, that I do over 200 or even over 300 seconds, of course, even more, when they are evil enough or if I'm just dumb at that time, which occurs sometimes ), I'm not sure about under 70, but maybe I did 1 or 2 or something like this that fast (not counting these same-pattern-ones)...
I'm just writing it 'cause it just surprised me, that someone said, that it can't be done, etc. And nope, I'm not cheating, I like this game and it would steal fun from it...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2013, 07:46 PM
pcuser pcuser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 122
Default

Here's one of the threads I was referring to: http://www.logic-puzzles.org/forum/s...ighlight=times. I'm not saying you are cheating. You certainly sound credible. So you might well be achieving very fast speeds. I was referring to comments in this and other threads where the administration weighed in on the subject.
As to doing puzzles quickly, there is new research pouring out about how people think. I know personally how an Asperger's brain can see things very differently. I have found ways to rule out squares merely from the patterns in the grid as I'm solving puzzles. So called savants experience the world very differently than most. Scientists are creating ways for non-autistic people to tap into that kind of thinking. I would love to be able to see things from multiple points of views as I believe it is a way of opening ones mind to new ideas and leads to more valid conclusions. I'm also not saying that being a savant is somehow a bad thing. It is merely a different way of seeing the world. I would also bet a lot of money that there are autistic players on this site. It's a pity that autism has a negative connotation to some people, thus causing it to remain in hiding.

Last edited by pcuser; 03-03-2013 at 08:06 PM. Reason: Adding a thought
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2013, 02:50 PM
Laura's Avatar
Laura Laura is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 77
Unhappy Aaaagh!!

Talking about record times!! I just looked at my PC and saw that somehow I had neglected to click the Submit button on a puzzle last night.

My solve time was 40522 seconds. Now that must be a record!!

Last edited by Laura; 03-04-2013 at 03:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-04-2013, 04:09 PM
zenobia43 zenobia43 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 108
Default

Laura, I saw that and wondered if your awesome 100% record had been spoiled by a server glitch. I'm glad it wasn't. Almost 30,000 games now without a single miss.

The server started two extra games for me this morning, and so far, it hasn't let me see the games or list those games in the recent games list.

If you see my games, send me a screen shot so I can see what I missed.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2013, 05:58 AM
Anachronismatic's Avatar
Anachronismatic Anachronismatic is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcuser View Post
I thought that unrealistic times for records weren't going to be posted. This has been addressed in at least 1 thread, probably more. I seem to recall a general consensus that times for 5X5 puzzles couldn't be achieved under 100 seconds without aids or memorization. I have seen a puzzle by zenobia43 with a record in the low 60 seconds and one by tulga.more of 65 seconds. Why do we have to compete with puzzle scores that at best were achieved by memorization and at worst by use of aids.
I think it's handled now. At least I've never seen a record score of under 101 seconds, and I score under 100 on occasion. It says it's a new record, but I doubt it's kept. I'm not nearly as fast as some here. So I think a score under 101 counts for your own statistics, but not as a record score.

I have no memory of past puzzles. I think it's realistic for me (at least) to get to about 55 seconds for a 4x4 and 75 on a 5x5. I'll probably improve a little more, but not much.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-03-2013, 02:24 PM
dwo1337 dwo1337 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1
Default

i had several 5x5 puzzles that I had scored under 100s without aid or memorization, yet none of my scores are posted... 5x5 under 100s is very, very possible without cheating.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-06-2013, 05:41 PM
Moeblank's Avatar
Moeblank Moeblank is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: MinnieSNOWduh
Posts: 1
Send a message via MSN to Moeblank Send a message via Yahoo to Moeblank
Wink I enjoy just playing.

I just like to play while watching tv and often go over a half hour because I'm more into the show. Also I like filling in all the X's. I guess it's my touch of OCD that doesn't let me put in just Dots and leave the rest blank unless I'm tired or made a mistake and have to go back and start over. Filling in the puzzle vertically doesn't finish the game, only completing the dots horizontally. Sometimes that's annoying. I don't always have to fill in the 'extra' common boxes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-03-2013, 08:07 AM
Grigor Grigor is online now
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Default Times under 100 seconds

I just posted a monthly score of under 100 seconds for the first time. I did not do all the puzzles this month, however. I did any 4x4 which came up, and also any 5x5 with an 'average solve time' of under 4 minutes 25 seconds. My normal time for a puzzle in that category is around 75 seconds, and the inevitable mistakes and brain cramps create a certain variability. As the end of the month approached, it was exhilaratingly stressful, because I knew that a poor score would throw the average up far more than a good score would bring it down.

In this subset of puzzles my insight is: if the clues were in the most efficient order one could write the solution down very quickly. So I go hunting for clues which address certain areas of the puzzle. In the 5x5 puzzles with low average times, focusing on the clues which give information about the top left hand category seems to be the fastest.

There are certain 4x4 puzzles that I have seen the path efficiently - my best time is 32 seconds.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

About Puzzle Baron

The Puzzle Baron family of web sites has served millions and millions of puzzle enthusiasts since its inception in 2006. From cryptograms to acrostics, logic puzzles to drop quotes, patchwords to wordtwist and even sudoku, we run the gamut in word puzzles, printable puzzles and logic games.